
Who knew an archive could be so beautiful? As a Public History student pursuing an archives certificate, I have spent a decent amount of time in various archive repositories. The cardboard boxes, steel shelves, and chilly temperatures can give off a utilitarian, static feel, despite the richness of the records they contain.
The Frederick Law Olmsted National Historic Site, where I have been working as an intern since February, also has some of these elements in order to best protect the records from degradation. However, the beauty and history of the location infuses the records stored here with a context that informs their meaning quite a lot. Logistical spacing issues and the advancement of digitization projects have drastically changed the way researchers now interact with these documents. The newer generation of researchers receive images of their requested items via a website, zip drive, or email attachment. Most will never set foot at the site.
Frederick Law Olmsted, Sr. is widely recognized as America’s premier landscape architect. His accomplishments in the fields of park design, town planning, and landscape architecture have national and international significance. In 1883, he purchased a home in Brookline, MA for both his family residence and professional office. He deemed the property “Fairsted,” and over the next 10 years used his expertise to design the building and grounds to match his aesthetic vision, creating a space to celebrate nature and offer an oasis amidst an increasingly urban setting.
Fairsted continued to be a hub of landscape design far past Olmsted’s retirement in 1895. His son, Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr., and stepson, John Charles Olmsted, continued the business as “Olmsted Brothers Landscape Architects.” During the first three decades of the twentieth century, the work volume and staff of the firm increased significantly. However, by the 1940’s the volume of work had begun to steadily decline.

In the 1960’s and 1970’s a renewed interest in Frederick Law Olmsted, Sr. emerged from scholars, landscape architects, environmentalists and historic preservationists. The importance of preserving the firm’s history was realized and became a movement. In 1979 the firm’s landscape design activity formally ceased and Fairsted was acquired by the National Park Service (NPS) as a National Historic Site. The NPS became responsible for preserving and cataloging the documents, plans, and artifacts left behind by the firm and interpreting Fairsted’s history for the public.
The Olmsted archives contain more than 1 million original documents related to landscape design projects the firm took on between 1857 and 1979. Contained are approximately 139,000 plans and drawings, and additional items including photographic negatives and prints, planting lists, lithographs, employee records, and office correspondence. The majority of research requests are for the firms’ plans and drawings, which have been used for landscape restorations, academic publications, and historical exhibits.
In the early stages, the archives staff focused on preservation, and specifically the plans, which were often brittle, dirty, and damaged. Next the items were cataloged and made available to researchers, who at that point needed to visit the site to view them physically. In keeping up with archival trends mass digitization of the plans and drawing became inevitable. Initially the plans and drawings were scanned into black and white tiff files.

Olmsted NHS is currently amidst a four year project to rescan plans and drawings to high resolution color images to meet current industry standards. Without an appropriate NPS platform, the archives staff have then been uploading the items to flikr for public access. Availability of scanned images has virtually diminished onsite researchers. Staff members are currently working out a system to include visitors to the flikr page to meet the annual visitation expectations of the site.
Currently storage of the Olmsted firms’ archival items is split between the Frederick Law Olmsted National Historic Site and the Springfield Armory National Historic Site. The option of offsite storage has brought up discussions on the necessity of archival storage at the Olmsted site in general. Fairsted is made of wood and highly susceptible to fire or other environmental factors. The plans are stored in a protected vault, but many other items are out in the open.
For now, the items at the Olmsted site will remain there, due primarily to a consensus that their presence adds visceral meaning to the site as a whole. The visitors on public tours are allowed that impalpable feeling familiar to all historians of being among meaningful historical records. This feeling is even stronger at the production site, in this case a beautiful home among gardens and wildlife. The researchers looking at files on their laptops will miss this.
Is it really worth researchers travelling miles and mile for a feeling? Of course not. But after working at the Olmsted site over the past 6 months it is clear to me that seeing, touching, and interpreting the plans while in the historic office brings an impact. If Olmsted researchers are in Boston, I hope they will make a stop at Fairsted.


